The artificial intelligence boom is reaching a critical juncture. After years of explosive growth, the economics of AI are shifting in ways that could upend who actually profits from the technology. While investors have poured billions into building the infrastructure behind AI, history suggests that the biggest winners may once again be the users—not the makers—of this new form of intelligence. Please see our initial blog on AI entitled, AI: The Intelligence Revolution
We may be reaching an inflection point where the baton passes from the companies that make AI possible to the companies that use AI to run their business more efficiently. As this transition happens, there are investment implications.
It all feels familiar. During the telecom boom of the early 2000s, companies raced to lay fiber optic cables that would remain dark for years. Today, AI firms are building capacity that may never be fully utilized. Even government agencies are being asked to backstop private-sector bets, a sign that confidence may be giving way to concern.
The rise of open-source models—particularly from China—has accelerated this shift. The so-called “DeepSeek moment” has shown that models like Kimi2 Thinking can match the performance of leading proprietary systems at a fraction of the cost. With open models improving rapidly and available for free, innovation is spreading far beyond the handful of companies that once controlled the field.
This dynamic echoes the lessons Warren Buffett drew from the early internet era. The technology changed the world, but the companies that built the infrastructure—Cisco, AOL, Yahoo—failed to capture lasting value. The same paradox may now be unfolding in AI: transformative impact, but disappointing returns for the builders.
By contrast, the infrastructure providers face mounting risks. Their capital expenditures are soaring even as margins shrink. A single misstep—betting on the wrong chip architecture or overbuilding capacity—could leave billions stranded.
The fear of missing out (FOMO) drives the upswing. Ironically, the same fear — of being caught at the top — drives the fall.
For investors, the prudent approach may be to gradually reduce exposure rather than trying to time the exact peak. Dollar-cost averaging out of overheated positions can preserve upside potential while limiting downside risk.

The material included herein is not to be reproduced or distributed to others without the Firm’s express written consent. This material is being provided for informational purposes, and is not intended to be a formal research report, a general guide to investing, or as a source of any specific investment recommendations and makes no implied or express recommendations concerning the manner in which any accounts should be handled. Any opinions expressed in this material are only current opinions and while the information contained is believed to be reliable there is no representation that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal, and no assurance can be given that a specific investment objective will be achieved.
The Firm accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of this material. However, Federal and state securities laws impose liabilities under certain circumstances on persons who act in good faith and nothing herein shall constitute a waiver or other limitation of any rights that an investor may have under Federal or state securities laws.
2X Wealth Group is a team at Ingalls & Snyder, LLC., 1325 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10019-6066. If you would like to unsubscribe, please click here.

